Masks: what the experts say. Or said

Presented without comment.


Seriously people – STOP BUYING MASKS! They are NOT effective in preventing general public from catching #Coronavirus, but if healthcare providers can’t get them to care for sick patients, it puts them and our communities at risk! 

Tweet by US Surgeon General, 29 February


We do not recommend the use of face masks as a means of protection from coronavirus.

Public Health England, March


[Wearing a face-mask] is not a good idea and doesn’t help.
UK Deputy Chief Medical Officer, Jenny Harries, 11 March


It seems kind of intuitively obvious that if you put something – whether it’s a scarf or a mask – in front of your nose and mouth, that will filter out some of these viruses that are floating around out there. [If it were effective against respiratory illnesses like the flu and Covid-19] the CDC would have recommended it years ago. It doesn’t, because it makes science-based recommendations.

Dr William Schaffner, professor of medicine in the division of infectious diseases at Vanderbilt University, March


In terms of wearing a mask, our advice is clear: that wearing a mask if you don’t have an infection reduces the risk almost not at all. So we do not advise that. The only people we do sometimes use masks for are people who have got an infection and that is to help them to stop it spreading around.

UK Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty, 4 March


If you are healthy, you only need to wear a mask if you are taking care of a person with Covid-19.

World Health Organization, 2019 

(Read this page and laugh and weep alternately)



There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask. When you’re in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better and it might even block a droplet, but it’s not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. And, often, there are unintended consequences – people keep fiddling with the mask and they keep touching their face.

Dr Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), 8 March



Face masks do not provide protection from respiratory viruses such as Covid-19 and do not need to be worn by staff.

UK government, February



You might have noticed more people wearing medical face masks in the last few weeks whilst out and about. Don't worry if you haven't bought one. The masks are fairly ineffective for the average person. Even the more heavy-duty respiratory masks which tend to be used in hospitals aren't very effective for the average person. They need to be properly fitted to create a seal and then removed and disposed of correctly. In fact, you may even increase your risk of infection as it's likely you'll be touching your face more. 

Medical website Patient.info, 3 March 


Recommended further reading here 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

12 reasons why I don't believe there's a climate emergency

I’m not a scientist. But I have reasons why I don’t fully trust the ‘climate emergency’ narrative. Here they are: 1 Looking back through history, there have always been doomsday prophets, folk who say the world is coming to an end. Are modern-day activists not just the current version of this? 2 I look at some of the facts – CO2 is 0.04% of the atmosphere; humans are responsible for just 3% of CO2; Britain is responsible for just 1% of the world’s CO2 output – and I think ‘ really ’? Will us de-carbonising really make a difference to the Earth’s climate? 3 I have listened to some top scientists who say CO2 does not drive global warming; that CO2 in the atmosphere is a good/vital thing; that many other things, like the sun and the clouds and the oceans, are more responsible for the Earth’s temperature. 4 I note that most of the loudest climate activists are socialists and on the Left. Are they not just using this movement to push their dreams of a deindustrialised socialist utopia? And
Read more

Is this the death of cinema?

2023’s Oscars ceremony was significant, as it may well have been the last time we see its kind. Because like the terrible idea to expand the football World Cup to 48 teams next time round, the rules are being changed by the Academy. See the press release here , which presents the most serious assault ever seen on the workings of the film industry.   Read it? Then I’ll continue. (Do please read it. It's horrifying. Yes, the Academy has been dodgy and corrupt for years, but this is a new frontier of awfulness.) It was of course a plan conceived in one of the worst years the civilised world has ever seen, 2020, when not only did the compassion fascists fulfil their dream of controlling people’s behaviour to the Nth degree (because of a disease akin to the seasonal flu), but the race obsessives/warriors/grifters fulfilled their dream of making people bend the knee to the great god of anti-racism (because of the death of a black recidivist), actions which did very little to halt the
Read more

Is this why Britain is failing?

I work for a company in England that has offices in different countries, including the US. It is a media company. I suspect it’s a fairly typical medium-sized corporation. In this post I will run down some of the things it has done in 2024 – though I could have gone further back (things started changing around 2018, with HR becoming ‘People & Culture’ and then got turbo-charged from 2020 onwards). I’m not saying that all of these things are bad things. Some are quite nice. They are not all ‘woke’. But many are. And taken together they suggest that many British companies in 2024 are perhaps not as focused on their core product as they might be. Valentine’s Day treasure hunt On 14 February, objects were hidden around the office for employees to seek out. First prize was a M&S voucher and there was a gift for all entrants. A decade or so ago you used to be able to secretly send a saucy message to an object of your affection, but this has long since ceased. Red Nose Day As
Read more